"Æèâè, Çåìëÿ! Îò âðàæäû ê ñîòðóäíè÷åñòâó öèâèëèçàöèé  





Texts/ Òåêñòû è òåçèñû




Mini-Moscow” and „Maxi-Copenhagen” symptoms of THOUSAND YEARS WAR of
‘Global Khazrstan’ against Gentiles (‘other nationals’)

As I’ve mentioned it in my lettrel (email) of Nov. 21, I was invited for
a conference “Let’s the Earth Live” in Moscow on Dec. 4th. At the place
it turned out that participating in this medium-size meeting, organized
by anti-glob.narod.ru movement, were principally Russian-speaking
scholars, fearing the “killing of nations” effects of present day
globalization. But not only them. One of young participants in this
interesting meeting, Žarko Tomanovic from Montenegro, spoke about “Khazar
billionaires” – in particular Peter Mank[1], Oleg Dieripaska[2], George
Soros and Natan Rothschild – colonizing at present his attractive for
rich tourists Mediterranean small country. The term “New Khazaria” was
not new for me, for already five years ago I’ve read a booklet “Kogda
Jewrei mashirujut” (‘When Jews are marching in’), which I got in Kiev
from Eduard Hodos[3], the head of the reformed Jewish community in
Kharkov, claiming that today’s liberal Russia is the “Third Khazarstan”,
an Empire ruled by Ashkenazi Jews, supposedly heirs of medieval, using
Hebrew alphabet, semi-nomadic merchants established at lower Volga river.
Taking into account that the most judaised – and at the same time most
“liberal” – countries of the West are traditionally England[4] and USA, I
propose to enlarge the Hodos/Tomanovic witty notion of „New Khazarstan”
onto these two “Atlantic” Anglosaxon Empires too. Their ultra-potent,
financial elites, usually from Ashkenazi origin (like Rothschilds), since
already several centuries are striving to rebuild, at the scale of whole
Globe, the old Khazar’s Kingdom, defeated more than thousand years ago,
in 965-967, by Kiev’s Slavic, not yet very Christian, prince Svyatoslav
(lit. “Glory to the World”).
Our mini-meeting in Moscow was held in a shadow of the oncoming, planned
for the whole week, MAXI-MEETING in Copenhagen and one speech at our
conference referred to the global warming problem, supposed to be worked
out during Copenhagen’s “Vanity Fair”. Namely, the Russian orthodox
church member, Israel Adam Shamir pointed out that the best and simplest
way to cool-off the global atmosphere, is a kind of a return to status
quo ante, it means to the situation of a practical lack of
advertisements, which are forcing naïve people to buy still more energy
consuming – and CO2 exhausting – gadgets. Such proposition means the
return to the situation we had in my apparently “poor” Poland until the
end of its socialist history in 1989. Judging from signals we are
receiving from Copenhagen, this trivial method of cooling down consumers
insatiable voracity, and at the same time saving the Earth from the
terror of its never ending “gadgeteerisation”, was not at all discussed
there. Such irrational behavior of world’s officials is to be expected,
for example in Poland today it is formally prohibited to praise any
achievement of the socialist past. Not only we have a novelized the last
autumn “Freedom of Expression Act”, prohibiting all expressions of
sympathy to totalitarian, both communist and fascist regimes, but
yesterday Dec. 14, I heard at the radio that the Polish government plans
to impose the strict control of the content of the private electronic
mail – this supposedly in order to fight against forbidden internet
hazardous games. For the public expressions of sympathy to “gone for
ever” times of socialist Spartan life style is forbidden too, so in the
oncoming year, a general e-letter similar to this one, may become, in my
country, the object of a judiciary persecution of its sender.
From important news arriving from Copenhagen we learned only that
super-rich, in large extend New Khazars (ie. Ashkenazi) directed
countries, which are responsible roughly for two thirds of world’s
machines made CO2 synthesis, agreed generously to pay about 7 billion
dollars to the group of poor countries, this in order to diminish their
CO2 production in “classical”, mostly coal and hydrocarbons fed,
furnaces. At the occasion of this bizarre meeting in Copenhagen, Polish
internationally known radiologist and member of Nongovernmental
International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), professor Zbigniew
Jaworowski, with whom I had an interesting discussion six weeks ago, have
published (despite his anti-religious stand) in a Catholic journal “Nasz
Dziennik” of Dec. 5th, a lengthy article titled “A Lie Directed Against
Our Civilization”. Jaworowski has a half century-long experience in
measurements of not only radioactive fallout resulting from atomic
blasts, but also of concentrations of heavy metals, and of the
composition of the archaic air trapped in samples of ice taken from old
glaciers of Spitzbergen Islands. According to his, and his colleagues
measurements, the recent rise of about 30 percent of CO2 in atmosphere,
has nothing to do with the global warming, long-term periodical warm-ups
of the earth surface, alternated with periods of large-scale glaciations,
are depending principally from solar and volcanic activity, half a
billion years ago the atmosphere contained 28 times more carbon dioxide
than today! Jaworowski writes: “Paragraphs 36 and 38 of the treaty
proposed at Copenhagen, are speaking about THE NECESSITY OF ESTABLISHMENT
OF A NON-ELECTED WORLD GOVERNMENT, which is supposed to control all
activity on the earth, evaluated from the point of view of emission of
CO2. It is an attempt to size the whole power over the globe and to
transfer unbelievable sums of money from all world taxpayers to the
organized at present World Center of Finances, and to this part of
industry, which has dressed itself into green feathers. …The 181 pages
long project of protocol proposes cuts in emissions of greenhouse gases
up to 95 percent in comparison with 1990, it would thus be the greatest
revolution in history, for 86 percent of energy produced in the world
comes from fossil sources… Such drastic limitations would destroy our
civilization, as proposes it guru of ecologists Maurice Strong and other
representatives of Western establishment … In this manner it would be
created an artificial enemy of mankind in order to assure the world-wide
rule of a tiny group fighting with this enemy, as proposed it the Club of
Rome already decades ago.” (By the way, the creation of an artificial
handicap, and subsequently the development of a parasitic priesthood
fighting this dummy ‘evil’, is a very old, “Judeo-Christian” trick. It is
sufficient to recall the biblical myth of “original sin”, and methods of
“salvation” from it, which only the J-Ch. priesthood is supposed to
furnish – see, in attachment, comments of K. Freeland and T. Mysiewicz to
enlarged ending of my ‘doklad’ for the Moscow’s conference.)
The announced at Copenhagen huge sum of seven billion dollars, destined
for the “help in modernization” of moderately consuming energy, “poor”
countries, would surely end up, in grand extend, in private pockets of
elites, which are ruling the targeted by Big Business nations. This
explains the unusual length of Copenhagen’s Vanity – or rather
Imbecility – Fair, during which secret agents (“pimps of capital”) of
World’s Khazar Invisible Government were surely searching for ‘other
nationals’, eager to play the role of prostitutes selling treasures of
their nations to a pack of self-chosen “investors in modernity”. It is
exactly what has happen in last few years in Republic of Montenegro, as
informed us Žarko Tomanovic (see the attached report of “Christian
Science Monitor”). During our mini-conference in Moscow several speakers,
and in particular the general Leonid Ivashov, at present the President of
Russian Academy of Geopolitical Problems (AGP), have warned us that “the
West” has not abandoned its genocidal, marked by incessant deceptions
(“by a deceit we make the war”), plans of total colonization of “the
Rest” of the Planet. Ivashov stressed that one can only lure himself
believing that USA would ease their grip over foreign countries having
access to most advanced technologies, and/or to fossil sources of energy.
As the origin of the “modernizing the Soviet Union” Gorbatchev’s
experiment with pierestroika is considered, one of vice-presidents of the
above-mentioned AGP has informed me that already in 1957, during the
World Festival of Youth in Moscow, young Mikhail Gorbatchev was
“contracted” for his future assignment of the “terminator” of the Soviet
In the above mentioned article Zbigniew Jaworowski argues that Copenhagen
Summit is an element of long term plan of Maurice Strong (“a longtime
Foundation Director of the World Economic Forum, a Senior Advisor to the
President of the World Bank, a Member of the International Advisory of
Toyota Motor Corporation”, etc. – see the Wikipedia), to diminish the
World’s gentile population, considered by “Khazar’s” (ie. Ahskenazi)
elite to be, literally, the “cancer of the Earth”. And indeed, in several
USA controlled East European countries this World Bank’s version of
famous NEP (“New Economic Politics”) was implemented with a success,
during our conference Natalia Vitrenko, the leader of the overtly
anti-American Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine (PSPU) has informed
us that the population of her huge and rich in natural resources country,
in last two decades, especially during the rule of Freedom House (of
Robers) installed “orangists” there, has shrunken from 50 millions to
only 39 millions of dwellers!
The hardly concealed goal of Khazar’s World Government consists of
organizing of all possible hardships for the poorer “cancer-like”
majority of the planet, and Jürgen Elsässer from Germany, an author of
an intersting book about hidden from general public details of « Khazar’s
Ten Years War » against not existing at present Yugoslavia, has told us
that the system of public underground transportation, the S-Bahn in
Berlin is actually in such sorry state that several lines had to be
closed, on others trains run sensibly slower, like just after the WW2,
when 70 percent of S-Bahn was destroyed. This new for Germans phenomenon
is the sign of similar « improvements » planned worldwide, as informed us
another vice-president of Russian Academy of Geopolitical Affairs,
Konstantin Sokolov, the next wave of « war by deception », of world’s
microscopic elite against remants of humanity collectivist past, is
I have to stress that in particular Russia needs an
implementation of these new “NEP” plans: as we found it after conference
with Elsässer, the inherited from the Soviet past Moscow metro still runs
impressively fast and its stations, ornated with frescos gloryfying
socialism’s achievements, become freshly renovated. Due to this
inadmissible for World Bank situation, common Moscowites move, within
limits of this megapolis counting 15 millions of inhabitants, more freely
and in more healthy manner than the hundred thousand of local
millionaires, by neccessity self-imprisoned in their looking like armored
vehicles, obligatorily coverd with dirt automobiles on huge, at present
incredibly overcrowded, Moscow arteries.
Another speaker at our anti-globalist meeting, a representative of
Russian still existing comparty, S. A. Stroyev ventured about the
possibility of renaissance of the idea of class strugle in the
contemporary world, but with the « mammonization » of the workers class
his idea seems to be a little outdated. More interesting for us were
words of of the first vice-president of AGP, Konstantin Sivkov, convinced
that the present creeping « globalization » must lead to a more overt
clash between Globalists (“Global Ashkenazi Khazarstan”, as I propose to
call this cancer-like Super Body), and “other nationals”, on their way of
extinction. During my speech, delivered partly in English partly in
Russian, I warned listeners, several of them believing that the salvation
they will find in orthodox religion, that in Poland the catholic Church –
and in particular our defunct Pope – were principal agents of
globalization. And that the similar situation may repeat itself in
Russia, too. I informed the audience that during the panslavic meeting in
still run by Milosevic’s socialists Belgrade in 2000, the defunct at
present ex-dissident from Soviet Union, Alexander Zinoviev has told us,
that it is an error of rulers of post-Soviet Russia to re-invest into
religion, for the half of Russian clergy are Judaists. They thus must be
eager to participate in the fulfillment of directed against ‘other
nations’, biblical prophecy “there will be one (global) folk, and one
(global) shepherd”, realizing secret orders of Lord of the Universe in
Hebrew known as Adon Olam.
My objections concerning ethical standards of J-Ch. Religions raised an
important question of reading the text prepared for the
[1] See the attachment
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0821/p11s01-woeu.html .
[2] See the resume of a book „Kingom of Khasars” written by Dejan Lucic
[3] See http://www.iamthewitness.com/Ukraine.html and
http://engforum.pravda.ru/archive/index.php/t-35116.html .
[4] Clifford Longley „Chosen People: the big Idea which shapes England
and America”, 2002. Clifford points in it „that even in Queen Elizabeth
II's 1953 coronation speech, one finds significant correspondences
between London-England and Jerusalem-Israel”,


December 11, 2009 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.

LaRouches Address Moscow
Anti-Globalist Conference

[PDF version of this article]

Dec. 4—The LaRouche Political Action Committee (LPAC) today released an address by Lyndon LaRouche, which was delivered by video recording, to a Dec. 3-4 conference held in Moscow, Russia, under the title "Let the Earth Live! From the Clash of Civilizations to Their Cooperation." LaRouche's presentation had top billing in today's main proceedings, being scheduled for airing after introductory remarks from conference Organizing Committee chairman Sergei Baburin, rector of the Russian State University of Commerce and Economics, and former deputy speaker of the State Duma of the Russian Federation.

Following LaRouche's video, which was announced by the conference organizers under the title "Agreement Among Four Powers Can Avert Total Collapse," scheduled speakers were Natalia Vitrenko, chairman of the Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine, and Gen. Leonid Ivashov, the former foreign relations head of the Russian Ministry of Defense, and current president of the Academy of Geopolitical Studies. On the conference as lead-off speaker in the afternoon session was Schiller Institute founder, and chairman of the German Civil Rights Solidarity Movement (BüSo), Helga Zepp-LaRouche.

The chief sponsors of this event are the Russian Anti-Globalist Resistance and Gen. Ivashov's Academy of Geopolitical Studies. The conference invitation was titled, "Save Human Dignity for the Sake of Mankind!" Other listed speakers include Tatyana Shishova, a leader of the Anti-Globalist Resistance, who is a teacher and an expert on the drug/counterculture degradation of children and the family, Deputy Minister of Information from the Moldovan Transdniestr Republic V. Rykovanova, and Borislav Milosevic, the younger brother of deceased Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic.

`People of the Cosmos'

The participants, among whom are representatives of European "anti-globalist" layers who are virulently anti-American, were in for a shock from LaRouche's speech, in which the U.S. economist posed the common tasks of mankind, with the horizon goal of a successful Mars colonization, making the human species into "no longer Earthlings," but "now people of the Universe or, as they say in Russia, the Cosmos." This can only be accomplished, LaRouche said, through the utter defeat of imperialist monetarism by sovereign nation-states, led by the Four-Power combination of Russia, China, India and, without fail, the United States.

Likewise, Helga Zepp-LaRouche warned that Europe could do nothing effective in today's world, and will not escape from the worsening financial and economic crisis, as long as it remains in the vise of the just-finalized EU Lisbon Treaty dictatorship.

A full transcript of LaRouche's address (recorded Nov. 18) and translation of the transcript of Zepp-LaRouche's presentation (recorded Nov. 22) are provided here. The English and German originals, respectively, were voiced over in Russian for presentation to the conference and will be circulated on Russian-language Internet sites.  

Verteidigung der Nationalstaaten!

Bericht von der Geopolitischen Konferez in Moskau

Dieser Blog wurde in den vergangenen Tagen nicht aktualisiert, wel ich auf einer Geopolitischen Konferenz in Moskau war. Dort gibt es zwar alles mögliche, aber Internet-Cafes sind rar gesät, und das Konferenz-Hotel hatte weder Computer-Anschlüsse noch LAN oder gar WLAN …

Aber die Konferenz war sehr interessant! Eingeladen und gekommen waren um die hundert Personen – es war also eine Expertenkonferenz, nicht für Publikum. Zu den Stars der Versammlung gehörten Sergej Baburin, der frühere Vize-Präsident der Duma und heute Direktor an der Moskauer Wirtschaftsuniversität, wo die Tagung auch stattfand, sowie Leonid Ivashov, ein legendärer General der Russischen Armee, der im Juni 1999 den Vorstoß russischer Fallschirmjäger auf den Kosovo-Flughafen Prishtina kommandierte (um der NATO nach dem Waffenstillstand mit Jugoslawien einen russischen Sektor im Kosovo abzutrotzen, was wegen der mangelnden Unterstützung durch den damaligen Präsidenten Jelzin leider nicht klappte).

Daneben referierten weitere Vertreter des Instituts für Geopolitische Fragen, dem Ivashov heute vorsteht und das eines der wichtigsten Think Tanks in der strategischen Debatte des Landes ist, sowie Vertreter aus der Ukraine, Polen, Montenegro, Israel, Libanon sowie meine Wenigkeit. Außer mir war kein Vertreter aus westlichen Staaten dabei, was auch dem Umstand geschuldet ist, dass die (im Hintergrund) mitveranstaltende Kommunistische Partei der Russischen Föderation (Vorsitzender: Sjuganov) keine allzu guten Erfahren mit ihrem Bruderpateien im Westen gemacht hat, weil diese nichts von der Verteidigung der Nationalstaaten halten, die wiederum für die KPFR ganz oben steht. Diese schwache Verbindungen mit dem Westen erklären wohl auch die ansonsten schwer verständliche Reputation, die das Ehepaar Larouche bei den Veranstaltern genießt – beide waren durch eine Videoeinspielung indirekt mit von der Partie. Bei allem, was sie ansonsten falsch machen, sind sie jedenfalls bei der Verteidigung des Nationalstaates sattelfest, und das gefällt den Russen.

Die These des Instituts für geopolitische Studien läßt sich etwa so zusammenfassen: Das Finanzkapizal entstand im Mittelalter in den oberitalienischen Stadtrepubiken, vor allem in Venedig, wanderte nach der Entdeckung Amerikas ins strategisch günstigere Holland (Antwerpen!) aus und wurde nach diesem Intermezzo für zwei,drei Jahrhunderte in London heimisch. Im 20. Jahrhundert führten wiederum weltpolitische Gründe zur Verlagerung der Kommandohöhen nach New York. Da der Niedergang des US-Imperialismus und des Dollars aber nicht mehr aufzuhalten ist, ist das Finanzkapital mittlerweile bereit, die USA unterzulassen und sich eine neue Operationsbasis zu suchen. Nach Einschätzung von Ivashov und Co. wird das – Rußland sein. Entsprechend negativ ist die Einschätzung der Putin-Regierung, die der Kollaboration mit dem internationalen Finanzkapital bschuldigt wird.

Die aktuellen Zuspitzungen dieser Theorie erscheinen mir, gelinde gesagt, nicht sehr gut fundiert. Aber das kann auch an dem Charakter von solchen Konferenzen liegen, wo für die Fundierung und Debatte immer wenig Zeit ist. Und die entsprechenden Ausarbeitungen gibt es bis dato nur auf russisch …

So spricht alles dafür, die Konferenz fortzusetzen. Das Klima war jedenfalls herzlich, und es herrschte große Einigkeit über eine Intensivierung der „eurasischen“ Perspektive. Auf Wiedersehen in Berlin?



Juergen Elsaesser, the speaker at the Conference "Let the Earth live!' writes in his blog about the impressions. He regarded the Conference as geopolitical and pays attention mostly to lections of Ivashov and their command (Sokolov and Sivkov)/ The most important idea is the history of the finance oligarchy (beginning from medievial Venice then through Holland to Britain), that is not supported by J.Elsaesser totally. The ideas of the LaRouches are also taken sceptically (maybe due to the tradition that exists in the Western humanities). Still the ides of continuing the discussion is supported.     


9 Kommentare »

  contraganda wrote @

Die nächste Geopolitische Konferenz ist in Gera:

Anmelden nicht vergessen!

  chrissedlmair wrote @

shhht, Jürgen. Du kannst doch nicht „eurasisch“ sa…*autsch* … wer hat den Stein geschmissen?

Im Ernst. Hätten die selbsternannten westlichen Linken aller Schattierungen, die sich nicht vom modernen antinationalismus, der nichts weiter ist als „Revisionismus“, abgrenzen, den Materialismus richtig verstanden, dann wüßten sie, daß die herausbildung Kontinentaler/Weltregionaler Blöcke ein Notwendiger Schritt in der Menschheitsgeschichte ist. Die Frage ist nur welche Klasse mit welchen politischen Kräften die führende Rolle einnimmt und diesen Etappensprung gestaltet. Das Bürgertum fällt dafür aus (von ein paar Einzelexemplaren abgesehen), wenn dies nicht so Enden soll wie die Herausbildung der EU, wo es am SChluß europaweit für alle die Löhne Rumäniens, die Preise Schwedens, die Überwachung wie in Großbrittanniens und Deutschlands Steuerrecht gibt.

Ich denke, daß die Übersteigerte Putin-Kritik in der geringen Transparenz des Regimes und der Rivalität zwischen KPRF und ER geschuldet ist. Man sollte das nicht überbewerten. Natürlich kann Rußland nicht auf dicke Hose machen und sich alleine mit dem globalen Finanzkapital anlegen. Das haben sie schon 2x gemacht, in der Revolution und den folgenden Interventionskriegen und dann natürlich beim Übefall Nazi-Deutschlands. Wieviel Blutzoll soll Rußland für die unfähigen Europäer noch leisten?

Die Weltrevolution ist eben kein Vorgang, der auf einer KI-Konerenz als einzelner globaler Akt beschlossen werden kann, sondern eine Generationen übergreifende Kette nationaler Revolutionen zur Herausbildung postkapitalistischer Staaten. Erst wenn diese die Träger der politischen, ökonomischen, und militärischen Dominanz bilden, kann das Finanzkapital gestürzt werden. Alles andere ist purer linker Extremismus. Und die Arbeiterklasse kann das nicht alleine Stemmen, schon garnicht im Trikont. Mit einem Anteil von über 60% an der Menschheit hat die Klasse der kleinen und mittleren Bauern (inkl Fischer usw) eine Position gegen die keine Revolution zu machen ist. Von Mittelstand in Industrie und Handel garnicht zu sprechen.

  Umm Hussain wrote @

Alles schön und gut ,aber war Russlands Umschwenken zusammen mit China in Richtung westlicher Anti-Iran-Politik auch Thema? Seitdem muss ich Russlands Politik zumindest in der Richtung leider mit anderen Augen sehen.

  Beobachter aus BaWü wrote @

Die eurasische Perspektive ist sicherlich ein interessante und überaus ernst zunehmende Perspektive. Jedoch für viele Gegenwartsmenschen schlichtweg nicht vorstellbar. Das sollte jedoch niemanden daran hindern auf solcherart von Konferenzen diese Thematiken zu diskutieren. Das die russischen Kommunisten mit Vorsicht zu genießen sind dürfte jedem klar sein der weiß woher das Geld für die „russische Oktoberrevolution“ unter anderem kam…..
Ein „euro-russischer“ Block wäre sicherlich eine echte Alternative zur angol-amerikanischen Hegemonie. Mann sollte die Kontakte hier intensivieren, besonder im Hinblick auf die Einseitigkeit in der bundesrepublikanischen Medienlandschaft. Die Aufritte von Elsässer bei Russia Today kann man hier für als beispielhaft ansehen.

  Köppen Daniel wrote @

Also eigentlich sollten sie es ja besser Wissen wenn sie schon das meiste ihrer Veröffentlichungen von den Larouches abschreiben!www.larouchepac.com

  Ingo wrote @

Ein sehr interessanter Beitrag, vilen Dank dafür an Jürgen Elässer!!

In der Tat ist es mal wieder sehr beschämend zu sehen, was „links sein“ heutzutage nicht nur bei den politischen Gegnern linker Ansätze, sondern auch bei der so genannten „Linken“ selbst im Westen Europa mittlerweile bedeutet: Verlogene moralintriefende PC-Hysterie und Hetze gegen Rußland und alle anderen Staaten, welche sich den USA nicht devot unterwerfen wollen…das zeigt wieder einmal, wie wichtig und richtig die Volksinitiative war und ist, um sich von diesem widerwärtigen Sumpf zu emanzipieren!!

  Ingo wrote @

@Beobachter: „ein „euro-russischer“ Block wäre sicherlich eine echte Alternative zur angol-amerikanischen Hegemonie.“

Sehr richtig!! Aber genau davor haben die neoliberalen Imperialisten in Washington (und auch in London), haben ihre devoten transatlantischen Speichellecker und Jubelperser ja auch so Angst…

Und genau darum ist es unbedingt notwendig, sich für dieses Konzept einzusetzen!

Denn, wie sagte es der olle Bebel sinngemäss einmal: „Wenn mich meine Feinde loben, dann habe ich etwas falsch gemacht!“

Und umgekehrt gilt natürlich auch: Umso mehr transatlantische Freedomfetischisten, unsoziale Heuschreckenfirmen, Finanzoligarchen und anglophile Politkasper gegen ein solches Konzept schreien , desto richtiger wird es!!

  Rufus wrote @

Ich muss widersprechen, Herr Elsässer. Das US-Establishment verlässt wie die Ratten das sinkende Schiff. Jedoch ist nicht Russland das Ziel, sondern die Stärkung supranationaler Organisationen: UNO, IWF, Weltbank, WHO, WTO, EU usw. = „New World Order“, ganz so, wie es „rechte Verschwörungstheoretiker“ aus den USA seit Jahrzehnten vorausgesagt haben.

  Rufus wrote @

@Köppen Daniel

Lyndon La Rouche ist Anführer einer Polit-Sekte. Und das meine ich auch so: eine Sekte! Ich kann nur davor warnen in seine Organisation einzutreten. Der Personenkult der dort um La Rouce betrieben wird ist schon abenteuerlich.