Marek Głogoczowski,
www.zaprasza.net/mglogo
Inanimate 'Deutero'
("Staying behind")
Animator of Western
Global Empire
No doubt that the
symbolic destruction
of Berliner Wall
on November 7th
(9-11 according to
notation of date we
use in Central
Europe), twenty
years ago, was a
monumental victory
of forces hidden
behind glassy walls
of the Global
Banking System. It
was the victory of
super-rich
bourgeoisie,
thriving in Ivory
Towers of their
luxurious
apartments, it means
places where
bourgeois ‘stay
apart’ from others.
This was not the
victory for common
people historically
known as gens (hence
“gentiles”),
dwelling on both
sides of this famous
“borderline” between
West and East. As
factories, as well
as agricultural
communities, in “won
to freedom”
post-Soviet space
began to crumble
after this historic
event of 9-11-89,
edifices of banks
soon appeared as
principal landmarks
of our urban
centers, frequently
accompanied by
buildings of brand
new – or
reconstructed after
the “night of
communism” –
churches.
The very idea that
profane, by a
definition, banks
are somehow linked
with churches, which
are supposed to
assure the spiritual
life of citizenry,
seems to be an
absurdity.
Nevertheless once we
read carefully
so-called “canonic”
books of
Christianity, this
idea makes sense.
Although the Moses’
Pentateuch generally
condemns usury, and
demands the
suppression of
accumulated debts
each seven years,
its last book called
Deuteronium – hence
the book of
“deutero-Moses” –
makes a small, only
few words long,
exception to this
general rule: “TO
A FOREIGNER YOU MAY
LENT UPON INTERESTS
… that the Lord your
God may bless you in
all you undertake in
the land which you
are entering to take
possession of it”
(V Mo, 23,21).
For nearly two
thousands of years,
which followed the
completion of the
Old Testament in 5th
century BC, due to
the general
illiteracy of
‘gentiles’, the
“Deutero-Mosaic”
recipe for world
conquest was hidden
from the sight of
ordinary citizens.
During these
not-so-remote times
the practice of
usury, as the means
of subsistence and
of personal
enrichment, was
limited practically
to the sect of Jews
“dwelling apart” in
ghetto-like suburbs
of Medieval towns.
The invention of the
printing press
roughly 500 years
ago, combined with
the growth of cities
and the translation
of Bible into
national languages,
made odious mosaic
“recipes for
success” attractive
to ambitious and
greedy bourgeois.
Protestant leaders
accepted the
“limited usury” as a
decent activity of
rich Christian
citizenry. Thanks to
this “hebraization”
– this word is
etymologically
derived from “habiri”,
which in Antiquity
meant ‘bandits’ –
banks, in particular
the Bank of England
founded in 1694,
become centers of
World Pecuniary
Conquest. At present
banks participate
practically in all
our bread earning –
and money spending –
activities.
Paraphrasing the
well known
invocation from
Gospel of John, we
may say, without
exaggeration that
with the advent of
“bankers’
democracies” “the
Word (of deutero-Moses)
become flesh and it
is dwelling among us”.
And the march of
banks sponsored
“knights of Mammon”,
frequently under the
protection of the
Holy Cross of
Crusaders, has not
yet ended. The
recent “color
revolutions”, with
their banners
resembling colors of
advanced stages of
malignant cancers,
inform us that the
“God’s word” (Logos)
of Deuteronomy is
revealing its ever
more aggressive,
mind killing forms.
What is the general
direction, into
which are pushing us
contemporary
mega-centers of
finances, located
principally in City
of London and at
Wall Street in New
York? Here I would
like to anamnese,
to recall the old
prejudice of “pagan”
philosopher
Aristotle against
men practicing
usury. In his
“Politics” he wrote
“Men called
bankers we shall
hate, for they
enrich themselves
while doing nothing”.
The earth-bound
Aristotle, contrary
to idealist Plato,
was despised by
early Fathers of the
Church, but his
notion of corruption
linked with activity
of a banker was well
understood by writer
(or writers) of
Moslem Qu’ran. This
Medieval book
demands the total
banishment of usury.
Thanks to our
“damned Moslems”,
Aristotle’s
‘biological’
understanding of
man’s doings
survived through
European Dark Ages,
and was
re-discovered in 13th
century by Western
Church – only to be
abandoned as “alien,
pagan influence”, by
Judaising
Protestants three
centuries later.
Why Aristotle hated
bankers? For a
Hellene the virtue
had to be
continually
practiced, be it
only during everyday
physical exercises.
To remain immobile,
as used to do it men
of commerce sitting
on their proverbial
benches, was/is
necessarily
corrupting their
spirit (literally
‘the breath’,
‘pneuma’ in Greek),
thus making these
“poor in spirit”
investors crippled,
both physically and
intellectually. The
manner of life of
upper classes always
radiate downwards,
and if atop of a
society we get the
Shylock (from
Shakespeare’s
“Merchant of
Venice”) type
crooks, the whole
social body will
soon become both
physically and
mentally corrupt. In
contemporary USA
already three out of
four young men are
judged, by medical
staff of US Army, as
unfit to perform
rude tasks linked
with life of an
ordinary soldier.
Which fact should be
a warning what will
happen with our
youth, in case it
will imitate too
zealously their
equals in “beacon of
nations”.
Every sedentary (in)activity,
especially these
which are performed
in isolated from the
outside world
cabinets and cabins
(be it cabins of
motorcars),
diminishes human
sensory stimulations
and thus
automatically
narrows man’s
endogenous, built on
sensory inputs,
comprehension of the
world. Moreover, the
necessarily limited
to self-enrichment
egoism of business
minded people
inhibits a sincere
exchange of views
with others. These
men of commerce
usually considered
their clientele as a
“game” to prey upon.
Due to this
“zoological” realm,
World Centers of
Finances “naturally”
are becoming Centers
of Disinformation
about the world.
This last statement
is a triviality very
well known to our
ancestors. Money,
which since its very
invention 3 thousand
years ago become the
Inanimate Animator
of behavior of greed
infested people, it
corrupts the vision
of worshipping this
“deity” people so
much that they
perceive “black
as white, ugliness
as beauty, the old
age to be youth, and
a coward as a knight”
– to recall the poem
of Shakespeare from
“Timon of Athens”.
This remarkable poem
was quoted by Karl
Marx in his short
essay “Das Geld”
(Money) published
already in 1844.
Marx wrote there “Universality
of properties
of money is the
essence of its
omnipotence. Money
plays the role of a
pimp (suteneur)
between the
necessity and its
object, between the
life and means of
man’s existence.”
This corrupting
power of money was –
and still is – felt
particularly strong
in “Land of the
Free”, it means USA,
and already in
1880ies the
preeminent New York
journalist, John
Swinton declared,
during the party
organized by owners
and chefs of
principal New York
journals, the
following:
„There
is no such thing, at
this date of the
world's history, in
America, as an
independent press.
(…) There is not one
of you who dares to
write your honest
opinions, and if you
did, you know
beforehand that it
would never appear
in print. (…) If I
allowed my honest
opinions to appear
in one issue of my
paper, before
twenty-four hours my
occupation would be
gone. The business
of the journalists
is to destroy the
truth, to lie
outright, to
pervert, to vilify,
to fawn at the feet
of mammon, and to
sell his country and
his race for his
daily bread (…) We
are the tools and
vassals of rich men
behind the scenes.
We are the jumping
jacks, they pull the
strings and we
dance. Our talents,
our possibilities
and our lives are
all the property of
other men. We are
intellectual
prostitutes.”[1]
As recalled it in
2007 Polish
politologist
Zbigniew Jankowski
in a longer internet
text titled
“AMERICANISM – THE
IDEOLOGY OF
INTELLECTUAL
PROSTITUTION”[2],
American “barons” of
finances (D.
Rockefeller,
J. P. Morgan,
P. Warburg, B.
Baruch et al.)
in 1915 joined their
resources in order
to buy, in secrecy,
all important
journals published
in United States.
Since this moment,
which two years
earlier was preceded
by a creation, by
the same group of
moguls of finances,
of private System of
Federal (Financial)
Reserves, the road
towards
“globalization” was
set up.
Where is leading us
this “All-American”
– for behavioral
tendencies of elites
are eagerly imitated
by masses –
Globalization
Project? Zbigniew
Jankowski, the
author of
association of
“Americanism” with
“intellectual
prostitution”,
observes: “The
goal of mass-media
is to promote the
conviction that the
modern industrial
culture is not the
product of whatever
ideology, and that
views of these
fellows, which are
its supporters are
objective, natural
and healthy. … This
picture is created
for us by priests of
public relations of
the contemporary
industrial culture.
Its most spectacular
product – apart of
heaps of rubbish and
degraded biological
environment – is the
passive, submissive
and devoid of
understanding of the
world
homo corporatus,
a biological
creature serving to
the consumption of
products of
industry, and to
mindless absorption
of its waste. All
this in an
atmosphere of
inoculated in him
hope to achieve
happiness, with
which mythical
illusions modern
mass media
are sprouting, like
never exhausted
geysers.”
The controlled by
the Trust of
Bankers, “spirit of
media”, aiming at
the general
disinformation, is
felt also in
supposedly
independent from
pecuniary
preoccupations
fields of scientific
investigations.
Already three
decades ago an
English sociologist
– and alpinist –
Michael Thompson
acidly remarked, in
his “anti-system”
book “Rubbish
Theory”, which he
somehow managed to
publish in 1979 by
Oxford University
Press, that in Life
Sciences we witness
“a systematic
channeling of
enquiry in order to
impel knowledge ever
further from the
truth.” Thompson
referred in this
remark to widely
publicized at that
time “discovery” of
Nobel Prize Winner
Jacques Monod that
“Chance is at the
origin of every
novelty in
biosphere”. The
devoid of any
reasonable proof,
belief of numerous
internationally
known scientists,
into validity of
this “scientific
assertion”, has
become so powerful,
that the close
collaborator of J.
Monod, later on the
laureate of literary
Prix Goncourt and
holder of the
Legion d’honneur
distinction,
neurologist J.-P.
Changeux has made of
these genetic chance
events “the
cornerstone” of his
theory of learning.
Inspired by
Darwinian concept of
“origin of species
by species
elimination by the
means of Natural
Selection” Changeux
assured his readers,
in a rapidly
translated into
English book “L’homme
neuronal”
published in 1983,
that “Apprendre
c’est éliminer”
– to learn is to
eliminate –
eliminate not only
supplementary
interneuronal
connections, but
also whole neurons,
with which brains of
young mammals are
densely saturated
during early stages
of their post natal
growth.
The logical
conclusion, which
one can derive from
this “(neo)Darwinian
Theory of Learning”,
suggests that “the
most educated
scientists shall
have only one neuron
in their heads”. It
is not an absurdity.
Such frivolous
association become
indirectly confirmed
by an opinion of an
another illustrious
scholar, American
linguist Noam
Chomsky, who in
1970ies was
“tutored” in the
domain of genetics
both by J. Monod and
J.-P. Changeux.
Limited by the
‘mindset’ he has
“acquired” from
them, in 1988
Chomsky declared
that…„We
have essential,
overwhelming
evidence that
substantial aspects
of our mental and
social life, among
them also the
language, are
determined as the
part of our
biological
endowment, and that
they are not
acquired by process
of learning, and in
particular not by a
training”[3].
Such bizarre opinion
informs us that
during his conscious
life as an
adolescent, the
future famous
linguist either has
not tried to learn
any other than
English language,
either that he has
amnesia concerning
hours he spent while
exercising his
proficiency of
foreign languages –
which languages of
“other nationals”
(‘gentiles’) usually
are disobeying,
supposedly
hereditarily coded,
stiff rules of
discovered by Noam
Chomsky, “universal
(English) grammar”.
The demonstrated
above,
mente captus-type
lack of
understanding how
novel mental
associations, novel
lingustical, manual
and even
immunological skills
are constructed, is
a real social
catastrophe in all
countries in which
aggressive
commercial regimes
(“bankers’
democracies”) become
established. And
this catastrophe of
non adequatio
rei et intellectus
– it means
inadequacy of
objects and their
mental
representations –
which is the
Aristotelian
definition of
falsity, we can
trace back to Mind
killing “cultural
viruses” hidden in
Dead Verses (logos)
of Old Testament. At
the end of this
short
doklad
(contribution),
prepared for the
conference “Živi,
Zemlju!
(Let’s the Earth
Live!)”[4]
I would like to
demonstrate how
these “acquired”, by
the intermission of
CIA controlled
science (CIA
is understood of
course as
Central
Imbecylizing Agency),
fake, (neo)Darwinism
inspired concepts of
“learning by
inactivity” are
leading not only
towards the Earth
competitive
devastation. The
Lamarckian atrophy
of not trained
interneuronal
connections
logically must lead
to the loss of
vision of all more
noble purposes of
human existence.
In order to put more
light onto this
‘politically
incorrect’ topic, I
would like to recall
a very interesting
contribution, made
by the director of
European Institute
of International
Affairs in
Luxembourg, dr
Armand Cleese,
during the
conference “Dialogue
of civilizations”
held at Rhodes in
2003. While speaking
about “America’s
search of a new
world order” Cleese
stressed that
“United
States wants a world
without enemies,
without threats,
without risks.
Therefore it is bent
upon eliminating all
enemies, all
threats, all risks.
It wants to crush
any opposition . It
wants a world
looking up to the
United States,
adulating the
American model,
adhering to its
principles and
values, obeying its
rules. It wants a
totally Americanized
world, without any
diversity, without
any dissidence.(…)
The quest of
the Americans for
absolute, total
security may lead,
may even be bound to
lead to absolute,
total insecurity”.
[5]
At the same World
Public Forum at
Rhodes in 2003 I had
a short speech in
which I indicated
that the present
project of
“globalization” has
already been
outlined in
prophecies of Old
Testament. This
sacred book of Jews
and Christians
preconizes not only
the total
eradication of “not
serving Lord” humans
and other wild
animals, but also
the construction of
“straight (four
lanes large?) roads
of the Lord”. It
preconizes even the
flattening of
difficult to climb
hills and filling up
of valleys!
[6].
Other significant
verses of OT, like
the one “you
shall be called the
priests of the LORD
…you
shall eat the wealth
of nations, and in
their riches you
shall glory”,
which verses were
probably written by
so-called “deutero-Isaiah”
(61, 6), are overt
instructions how to
behave in order
become a successful
priest of the “Lord
of hosts”. Hosts of
prostitutes of
course, as argue
Swinton and
Jankowski in the
case of contemporary
Global American
Empire.
This “New World’s” –
called also “New
Israel’s” – project
of total
exploitation,
sterilization,
decerebralization
and even flattening
of the Globe is
surely the worst
danger which our
Planet has
encountered during
its geologically
recorded history.
The problem resides
in increasingly
“flat” brain
encephalographs of
hyper-rich,
principally
Judeo-Protestant-American
elites, overtly
dreaming of such,
preconized in Bible,
“Earth Re-Creation”.
These men are used
to reason in a very
simplist manner, not
taking into account
differentia
specifica
between living and
not living objects:
a car or a bike used
on bumped curvy road
becomes sooner
broken down, than in
case it is used on a
smooth and straight
one. So by making
straight and smooth
roads – and by
“domesticating” the
environment in such
a way that human
existence becomes
devoid of necessity
to perform any
significant physical
effort – people are
expected to live
longer and happier.
Simple, isn’t it?
This “positivistic”
manner of reasoning
we can trace back to
“Novum organum”
of Francis Bacon
completed in 16th
century. And of
course in schools
children shall be
exempt of any
stressing them
tasks, for only in
this manner the
intelligence hidden
in their genes can
flourish. This is
the argument of Noam
Chomsky, who is
truly believing in
Carthesian paradigm,
claiming that humans
are inanimate
machines,
distinguishing
themselves from
other zoon,
by their faculty of
speech.
But the realm which
see gens
(‘gentiles’)
belonging to homo
sapiens
subspecies is
completely different
from the one loudly
propagandized by
mentioned above
“chosen people” (Monod,
Changeux, Chomsky,
Bacon, Descartes,
and of course
Richard Dawkins, the
proud apostle of
“The God (of
Scientific)
Delusion”, as
confirms it his
voluminous book from
2008). According to
precise observations
made by Swiss
biologist and
psychologist Jean
Piaget, without
appropriate physical
and sensorial
exercises, it is not
possible to achieve
more mature levels
of world
understanding. The
unpleasant by a
definition
“perturbations” are
necessary to wake up
intelligence in
adolescents, as well
as in adults. Grown
since childhood with
Darwino-Cartesian
‘blinders’ –
compared by R.
Dawkins, in the
mentioned above
work, to Afghani
women’s “burkas”–
so-called
“developed” people
today are accustomed
to protect
themselves from all
agents, which may
damage their
cherished DNA. Even
the ordinary UV of
Sun is considered at
present to be
carcinogenic. But
scrupulous
radiologists have
confirmed a
completely inverse
effect of small –
and even medium
intensity –
irradiations, which
necessarily is
perturbing “the
wellbeing” of
cellular DNA
structures. A year
after the
catastrophe in
Chernobyl, in
copiously sprayed
with dust of
radioactive cesium
Hungary, the number
of children born
with genetically
coded disease called
Down Syndrome
diminished by 20 %
in comparison to
previous years;
experiments with
slipperworts, grown
in aquariums
isolated by thick
lead walls from
cosmic and telluric
radiation,
demonstrated that
these
mini-slipper-like
organisms, kept in a
total isolation from
damaging their DNA
high energy rays,
were losing their
vitality, sensibly
diminishing their
reproduction[7].
Why such “miracles”
happen? Contrary to
popular scientific
beliefs that
“(animate) animals
are (inanimate)
machines”, which
beliefs are dating
from times of
Descartes’ “cogito
ergo sum” (it is
a variation of “I
am, who I am”)
self-discovery,
LIVING BEINGS ARE
SELF-REGENERATING
OBJECTS. It means
that their long
persistence in
comfort, not
necessitating
exercise of their
auto-repair
faculties, leads to
these capacities
atrophy, and thus
automatically it
leads to the loss of
their vitality.
Putting together
vivid descriptions
made by Dawkins,
Marx, Cleese,
Jankowski and
Swinton we may say
that we have to
tear off “scientific
burkas” imposed,
by Lord Suteneur
Of All Prostitutes,
onto minds of
adulating the
American model
passive, submissive
and devoid of
understanding of the
world
humanoids
(expression of
Alexander Zinoviev),
which become
the tools and
vassals of rich men
behind the scenes.
These rich men
behind scenes formed
semi-secret “Trust
DE” (it is the title
of unpublished book
of Illya Erenburg
from 1925, DE means
“Destruction of
Earth” in particular
of Europe). This
TRUST is acting at
the image of
biblical Lord of
Hosts, which by
intermission of army
of CIA directed
whores, is obscuring
nefarious long term
results of constant
wellbeing,
characterizing the
life of contemporary
“chosen people”.
These “G-d blessed
people” ever more
tightly isolated
inside concrete and
glass walls of their
“ivory towers”, and
thus enjoying
proverbial English
“splendid
isolation”, are
becoming, like Jews
in their historical
ghettos, autistic,
totally
self-centered and
prone to all
perversions.
Aristotle observed,
at the beginning of
his “Metaphysics”,
that all men desire,
by Nature, to know.
It is not the case
of dominant at
present scientific
establishment. Its
arrogant ignorance
of self-repair (and
self-improvement)
faculties of zoon,
is the logical
outcome of their
fervid cult of
Mammon. As elegantly
observed it Karl
Marx, it is horrible
that something dead,
which is the product
of not necessarily
transparent
intentions of crab (Krebst)-like
Hebrew scribes
hidden in a remote
past, has so much
influence onto our
existence. Without
abandonment of “the
Law”, called Torah,
which “Law of
Hebrews” (i.e.
‘bandits’) is
contradicting the
universal ethical
principle labeled
“categorical
imperative” by
Immanuel Kant, we
will not be able to
revitalize the
Earth. That’s for
sure. And if someone
ignores what Kant’s
moral imperative
demands of homo
sapiens, I repeat “you
may do whatever you
are disposed to, on
the condition that
you will accept that
others will do the
same thing”.
Which imperative of
course puts into
question the ethics
of Christian “God”.
This “Lord of hosts”
in order to assure
the success of his
global dominion, has
not hesitated to
arrange a Calvary
for his own,
supposedly beloved,
Son.
[3]
N. Chomsky
„Spojrzenie
w przyszłość:
perspektywy
badań nad
ludzkim
umysłem”
(Looking
into future:
perspectives
of research
on human
mind), 1988
[in]
Noam
Chomsky,
Jean Piaget
et al.
Noama
Chomsky’ego
próba
rewolucji
naukowej
(N.
Chomsky’s
attempt of
scientific
revolution),
IFIS PAN,
Warszawa
1996
[6]
M.
Głogoczowski
„Globalization:
The Project
of “Flat
Earth” and
Flat Brain
Cortices –
but No
Dialogue of
Civilizations
Ahead” (overtitle:
RELIGIOUS
ROOTS OF
AMERICAN
SUPERPOWER),
World
Affairs,
vol. 7, no
4, New Delhi
2003;
www.adelaideinstitute.org/Dissenters/shamir1